KooKLooK Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 Réponse #400 :coolspot: ... :jesors: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charp Posted June 17, 2005 Author Share Posted June 17, 2005 400....milliseconde :D :jesors: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPF8 Posted June 18, 2005 Share Posted June 18, 2005 salut, voilà, j'ai OC mon P4 2,8 northwood : super Pi : 41,391 sec P4 2,8 @ 3,4 Ghz 512 K L2 ram : 1 Go pc3200 timing : 2.5-3-3-8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charp Posted June 19, 2005 Author Share Posted June 19, 2005 Je vais le mèttre a jour cette après midi surement :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charp Posted June 21, 2005 Author Share Posted June 21, 2005 MAJ :fume: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorgorgueu Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 :dingue: je perds encore des places. Ma ram: 2*512 PC 3200, 3/3/3/8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daemonium Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 Charp, t'as peur de perdre des places en utilisant la version de superpi précise? :bou: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charp Posted June 22, 2005 Author Share Posted June 22, 2005 Non j'ai utilisé la version de super Pi précise mais j'ia fait 41.000 Sec pile :D Regarde le screen (la mon proc est a 2.2 Ghz pas comme quand j'ai fait le test a 2.25 Ghz) : Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KooKLooK Posted June 23, 2005 Share Posted June 23, 2005 Charp, ta blonde n'est pas jalouse de ton fond d'écran? :ooo: lol :biere: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charp Posted June 23, 2005 Author Share Posted June 23, 2005 Non elle ne l'est pas :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorgorgueu Posted June 23, 2005 Share Posted June 23, 2005 par contre moi je le suis !! Ou tu as eu une photo de ma copine :o Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charp Posted June 23, 2005 Author Share Posted June 23, 2005 :frenchy: :frenchy: On en trouve partout :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorgorgueu Posted June 23, 2005 Share Posted June 23, 2005 :frenchy: :frenchy: mais heu :niarf: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaMiKaSe Posted June 23, 2005 Share Posted June 23, 2005 Mon PC de bureau: Barton 2500+ 1826MHz 2200MHz nForce2 Ultra 400 512 Mo PC3200 Cache niveau 1: 64Ko Cache niveau 2: 512Ko temps: 46,250s Mon portable: pentium M 1800 MHz 1800 MHz 512 PC 2700 Cache niveau 1: 32Ko cache niveau 2: 2Mo temps: 44,844s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KooKLooK Posted June 23, 2005 Share Posted June 23, 2005 Je pense que cela prends une MAJ :respect: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charp Posted June 23, 2005 Author Share Posted June 23, 2005 Je méttrais a jour quand je pourrais, parce que il y a des problèmes de ADSL avec l'orage :voila: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeGGaaSuSS Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charp Posted June 26, 2005 Author Share Posted June 26, 2005 Je vais faire une mise a jour mais pas ce soir surement demain matin en me reveillant :biere: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagleib Posted June 26, 2005 Share Posted June 26, 2005 Barton 2500+ 1837.5MHz nForce2 400 512 Mo PC3200 (2*256) Cache niveau 1: 64Ko Cache niveau 2: 512Ko temps: 58,296 s cas : 2.5 enfin je crois si ce n'est pas 3 ... c'est de la samsung Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charp Posted June 26, 2005 Author Share Posted June 26, 2005 Enfaite il faut tu me donne les timings. Exemple : 2.5/3/3/8 ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagleib Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 Je crois que j'ai trouvé... 1ère : @200 : 2.5-4-4-8 2ème: @166:2.5-3-3-7 @200 :3.0-3-3-8 C'est normal que les 2 memoire n'ont pas le meme timming alors que c'est les même ? Es ce que mes timmings sont bons ? Mon proco n'est pas o/c donc normalement les memoires doivent se mettre à 166 ... pourquoi il y en a une a 200 et l'autre qui m'affiche 133 166 et 200 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charp Posted June 27, 2005 Author Share Posted June 27, 2005 Tes timings doivent ètre 2.5/3/3/7 si tu es synchro avec la ram. Et c'est impossile que les deux barettes ont des tmings différent :biere: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagleib Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 Tes timings doivent ètre 2.5/3/3/7 si tu es synchro avec la ram.Et c'est impossile que les deux barettes ont des tmings différent :biere: 236552[/snapback] Et pourtant, regarde les images ... 1 ère memoire 2 ème memoire Comment faire pour qu'elles soient syncro ? Merci Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charp Posted June 27, 2005 Author Share Posted June 27, 2005 Elles le sont synchro la il te parle des performances dans chaques barrettes c'est tout mais il ne te dit pas les timmings, telecharge Cpu-Z ici Puis va dans memory et dit moi le CAS latency, RAS to CAS Delay, RAS Precharge, Cycle Time. :biere: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorgorgueu Posted June 27, 2005 Share Posted June 27, 2005 Everest est sortie en version 2 :respect: installe la et va dans l onglet overcloking, la tu auras les timings en cours :respect: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.